A recent essay at The Atlantic deplores how wealthy people gentrify urban neighborhoods, making them sanctuaries of silence. Silence is a manifestation of class and racial privilege. How much better if those wealthy whites would just let the other side of the binary express itself in all its noise and craziness.
![](https://thedailyeudemon.com/content/images/2024/06/Why-Do-Rich-People-Love-Quiet.jpg)
One reader responds:
![](https://thedailyeudemon.com/content/images/2024/06/Why-Do-Rich-People-Love-Quiet-Response.jpg)
I live in a semi-rural area, so I don't know who's right, but based on my (many) excursions into urbania, I suspect the reader is.
The essayist's, incidentally, is an exercise in the left hemisphere: a narrative written to fit a logocentric idea. The story is written from a rationalized ideal. It's an exercise in Russell Kirk's "defecated rationality." (And no, I'm not being a moron for putting Kirk and Derrida on the same side of an argument . . . I've explored this and will continue to do so),
The reader's response is more right-hemispheric: reality ("real reality," embodied, earthy, etc.) giving rise to a reflection on what is.
"Narrative": a bogus story written from an ideal.
"Reflection": an honest attempt to come to grips with what actually is.