Current Affairs

WaPo and others continue to think there's a way to placate the rioters [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/08/AR2005110801109.html] : > But the insoluble violence in urban France should inspire more than just schadenfreude in this country. Although there isn't

Mark Steyn has, as usual, a great piece at The Telegraph today about the Frog riots [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2005/11/08/do0802.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2005/11/08/ixopinion.html] . Excerpt: > The first country formally to embrace "multiculturalism"

WaPo has run a piece this morning about the potential 5-Catholic Supreme Court [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/06/AR2005110601134.html] . The first half is ho-hum: the composition reflects tolerance toward Catholics, but does it reflect America's demographics? But the second

The NYT runs a lengthy article about Alito this morning [http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/07/politics/politicsspecial1/07alito.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=ac4868138c94cfe3&hp&ex=1131426000&partner=homepage] . A very nice piece. Either Alito is a heckuva good man and the

Great column [http://www.suntimes.com/output/steyn/cst-edt-steyn06.html]. Excerpts: > For half a decade, French Arabs have been carrying on a low-level intifada against synagogues, kosher butchers, Jewish schools, etc. The concern of the political class has been to prevent the spread of these attacks

WaPo logs on today with a piece that bleeds sympathy for the French rioters [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/05/AR2005110501515.html] . It's the same kind of analysis we're accustomed to: these people are neglected, disenfranchised. But then you look more

As the first wave of the Eurabian Civil War [http://www.radioblogger.com/#001126] enters its tenth day, it might be a good time to re-read Theodore Dalrymple's prophetic (2002) piece, "The Barbarians at the Gates of Paris." Link [http://www.city-journal.org/html/

This is Kafkaesque. No, it's just stupid. The paternalists are concerned that the warning stickers on prescription drugs don't give us enough information and may prompt people not to read the full instructions. Can a ban against those efficient stickers be far behind? NYT Link [http:

To quote (roughly) a line from Jurassic Park: "You were so concerned about figuring out if you could, you forgot to ask if you should." That might be a big part of this polling figure: > Another interesting poll result from the University of Virginia . . . has to do