Skip to content
Clint

I made myself spend ten minutes this morning, reading accounts of the Women's March. I'm simply stunned at the sea of idiocy. I could take issue with many statements, but I guess I'll pick on Scarlett Johansson, who, according to the Gray Hag, said "her own daughter, 'may potentially not have the right to make choices for her body and her future that your daughter Ivanka has been privileged to have.'"

I'm not even sure how to parse this. At the surface, she's simply saying that Roe could be overturned and her daughter won't have the right to abort her child. Okay, fair enough. But why bring up Ivanka, who, as far as I know, has never had an abortion. And why use the adjective "privileged," when your entire intellectual world is framed in "Rights!!!!"?

I can only conclude that Ms. Johansson is trying to smear Ivanka with the sin of being rich. Now, I respect Mark 10's camel analogy as much as the next guy, but I'm tired of the Hollywood elite criticizing the rich. They want to have it both ways: Criticizing the rich/privileged and being rich/privileged at the same time. The hypocrisy is just so bald, it's shocking that these dolts are even invited to speak.

Addendum:

Scarlett Johansson Net Worth: $80 Million. Johansson holds the 65th spot on Forbes' 2015 Celebrity 100 Earnings list by bringing in $35.5 million for the year. The actress had previously been earning more than $10 million per movie, but her rate has reportedly risen.

Latest