From E.J. Dionne (no friend of pro-lifers) column in WaPo this morning:
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has said that the court overreached in Roe . In his indispensable new book, "Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts Are Wrong for America," University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein -- obviously no conservative -- sees Roe as having "shaky constitutional foundations."
Whenever you're ever trying to figure out whether a person is an ingenuous pro-choicer (they do exist), ask him about Roe. If he sees nothing wrong with Roe, from it's statute-like prose to the way the case came in front of the Court, you know you're dealing with someone who is disingenuous or ignorant.
