Is God an Accident II

Pretty good analysis at AI Cont. regarding the Bloom piece (is God an Accident?). Excerpt from conclusion:

The problem here isn't with Darwin; it's with Dawkins (and Bloom, and, across the aisle, Intelligent Design boosters). He is (and they are) trying to get evolutionary theory to carry water for atheism (or theism) - something no properly scientific theory is equipped to do. (That's why it's called meta-physics; it goes beyond physics.)